Endovascular Procedures versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke with Tandem Occlusion of the Anterior Circulation

Abstract

PurposeStroke with tandem occlusion within the anterior circulation presents a lower probability of recanalization and good clinical outcome after intravenous (IV) thrombolysis than stroke with single occlusion. The present study describes the impact of endovascular procedures (EPs) compared with IV thrombolysis alone on recanalization and clinical outcome. Materials and MethodsThirty patients with symptom onset less than 4.5 hours and tandem occlusion within the anterior circulation were analyzed retrospectively. Recanalization was assessed per Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) classification on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or digital subtraction angiography within 24 hours. Infarct size was detected on follow-up imaging as a dichotomized variable, ie, more than one third of the territory of the middle cerebral artery. Clinical outcomes were major neurologic improvement, independent outcome (90-d modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH; per European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study criteria), and death within 7 days. ResultsPatients treated with EPs (n = 14) were significantly younger and had a history of arterial hypertension more frequently than patients treated with IV thrombolysis alone (n = 16). Recanalization (ie, TICI score 2b/3; EP, 64%; IV, 19%; P = .01), major neurologic improvement (EP, 64%; IV, 19%; P = .01), and independent outcome (mRS score ≤ 2; EP, 54% IV, 13%; P = .02) occurred more often in the EP group, whereas infarct sizes greater than one third of the MCA territory (EP, 43%; IV, 81%; P = .03) were observed less often. Rates of sICH (P = .12) and death within 7 days (P = .74) did not differ significantly. ConclusionsHigher recanalization rate, smaller infarct volume, and better clinical outcome in the EP group should encourage researchers to include this subgroup of patients in prospective randomized trials comparing IV thrombolysis versus EP in stroke.