Abstract

In their recent study on endotoxin exposure as a risk factor for asthma, Thorne and colleagues found a relation between floor dust endotoxin levels and diagnosed asthma, asthmamedication, and wheezing among adults (1). While I agree with the authors’ conclusion that the symptomatology reflects an inflammatory response that is more pronounced among those with an allergy, I would caution against any conclusions concerning causality. In house dust, endotoxin is only one of many microbial cell wall agents (MCWAs) with biological effects; other examples are mycobacterial lipoglycans, lipoteichoic acid, peptidoglycan, N-acetylmuramic acid, and lipoarabinomannan (2). Many MCWAs have inflammatory properties. Although the MCWA (1-3)-D-glucan is not inflammatory by itself (3), it reflects the presence of mold cells, which cause a neutrophilic inflammation akin to endotoxin. Previous reports have shown a significant correlation between levels of airborne endotoxin and (1-3)-D-glucan (4). So while we all would like to see a specific agent as the reason for effects found, the environment seldom provides this opportunity. From a practical point of view, however, endotoxin is useful as a marker for risk, and a reduction of these levels, particularly in occupational settings, will reduce the risk, whether this is related to endotoxin or some other covarying agent.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call