Abstract
A survey of the presence of endothecial thickenings in 20 genera from 11 families of porate monocotyledons tested the long‐standing hypothesis that porate anther dehiscence is correlated with the absence of thickenings. Although this hypothesis is widely repeated in texts, it has been supported by a limited, biased data base from studies of Ericaceae and Melastomataceae, two large families of dicotyledons. The results of our broad study of monocotyledons show that endothecial thickenings are present in most porate monocotyledons. Thickenings are absent in only two of the 11 porate families surveyed, Mayacaceae and Commelinaceae, both in the Commelinales. Thickenings are also absent in Xyris (Xyridaceae), a nonporate genus. These findings indicate that in monocotyledons porate anther dehiscence and the absence of thickenings are not as closely related as previously supposed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
