Abstract

Introduction: Spinal stenosis is a chronic, debilitating condition that is expected to affect an increasing number of people as the population ages. Symptomatic spinal stenosis, like other spine pathologies, including disc herniation and degenerative disc disease, traditionally required an open decompressive surgical approach if more conservative approaches failed. An emerging alternative has been developed to address the needs of this population of patients in the form of endoscopic spine surgery (ESS). Advantages of ESS include minimal tissue trauma, decreased risk of damage to the neurovascular structures, minimal epidural fibrosis/scarring, reduced hospital stay, early functional recovery, and improved cosmetic outcomes. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of patients undergoing transforaminal endoscopic spinal decompression at an academic pain program.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records with approval from the University of Florida Institutional Review Board (IRB #202001529). Twenty patients underwent successful transforaminal endoscopic lumbar spinal decompression surgery at UF Health Pain Medicine from July 1, 2019, to June 1, 2020. The majority of cases were performed at L4-5 (n = 14), followed by an equal number (n = 3) of cases at L3-4 and L5-S1. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores from patients' pain clinic appointments were obtained from the electronic health records system to assess the intervention as a pain relief strategy.Results: Patients had an average pain reduction of 82% (SD = 31%), resulting in an average postoperative pain score of 1.8 (SD = 2.8) on a 10-point VAS.Conclusion: This study highlights the benefits of endoscopic spine surgery for patients, including pain reduction and reduced scarring.

Highlights

  • Spinal stenosis is a chronic, debilitating condition that is expected to affect an increasing number of people as the population ages

  • The majority of cases were performed at L4-5 (n = 14), followed by an equal number (n = 3) of cases at L3-4 and L5-S1

  • Conventional decompression with laminectomy or extensive resection can lead to a variety of undesirable outcomes, including increased blood loss requiring transfusion, complications related to general anesthesia, and hospital stay

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spinal stenosis is a chronic, debilitating condition that is expected to affect an increasing number of people as the population ages. The number of people affected is expected to increase with an aging population worldwide and is predicted to reach 64 million within the decade in our country [2] These patients are often referred to interventional pain specialists, with symptoms concerning neurogenic claudication. Interventional pain specialists may use a variety of interventions to help treat the pain, including epidural steroid injections, percutaneous image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression, or interspinous spacer placement If these interventions are unable to provide durable relief, these patients are typically given the option for referral to spine surgery or conservative management with medications and physical therapy. Advantages of ESS include minimal tissue trauma, decreased risk of damage to the neural structures and epidural vessels with a decrease in subsequent epidural fibrosis/scarring, reduced hospital stay, early functional recovery, and improved cosmetic outcomes [3,4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call