Abstract
Objectives To assess the feasibility, effectiveness and morbidity associated with Endoscopic Axillary Dissection. Methods All studies published from 1990 until December 2008 in MEDLINE, LILACS, and COCHRANE. These studies were selected by two levels of criteria. Methodological designs, operating parameters, and postoperative follow-up were selected from each publication. Results We extracted 49 citations and 12 were analyzed. The average age was 54.95 ± 5.84 years. The surgical time was longer than the open procedure. The average number of extracted nodes exceeded ten. Technical problems and intra-operative complications had a rare occurrence. The recurrence was 0.5% (4/752). Two port metastases were registered. The methodological quality score average was 14.75. Conclusions This procedure meets the tumor control and staging requirements. It has shown similar results to the traditional procedure in terms of patient recovery, although the available evidence is not methodologically appropriate and does not justify its oncological safety.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
