Abstract
e14148 Background: Multiple different immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have now received FDA approval for nearly 70 separate indications covering 14 different tumor types. Patients treated with these agents in clinical trials have an observed incidence of immune related adverse events (irAEs), including endocrinopathies, which may increase morbidity and mortality. Limited information describes the incidence and impact of these events outside of clinical trials. Methods: Retrospective data from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) of patients treated with ICI has been aggregated to understand the impact of these events in a standard of care setting, with a goal of improving patient care through predictive models and contributing to the understanding of the mechanisms and response to treatment. Results: Between October 2015 and December 2018, 10,280 patients were prescribed ICI at VA medical centers, with an average age of 70 years (range 20-99). A total of 11098 ICI orders, allowing for combinations or sequential treatments. Overall, nivolumab was prescribed 6024 times (54.3%), pembrolizumab 3976 (35.8%), ipilimumab 565 (5.1%) and atezolizumab 519 (4.6%). Avelumab (13) and durvalumab (1) had limited use. A candidate set of potential endocrine adverse events was estimated based on selected ICD10 codes recorded for the first time after treatment with ICI (Table). Conclusions: The frequency of endocrine immune related adverse events has been reported to be 5-10%. Here we have identified a cohort of ICI treated patients who may have developed endocrine adverse events. This cohort will be used to evaluate phenotyping, potential biomarkers and models of predictive risk.[Table: see text]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.