Endocrine and Nutritional Management of the Post-Bariatric Surgery Patient: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

A clear association between allergy and nasal polyposis (NP) is not determined and the role of food intolerance in patients with NP is not investigated by oral food challenge (OFC). To investigate the relation of salicylate food intolerance and atopy in patients with NP according to recurrence and aspirin sensitivity. A cross sectional multicenter study was done in two tertiary centers for allergy in Iran. Adult patients with NP were selected for the study that had been referred to allergy clinics. The oral aspirin challenge (OAC) test was performed to identify aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and the OFC test was used to investigate food intolerance. Atopic evaluation was performed by skin-prick tests, nasal smear and blood eosinophil count as well as serum total IgE. One hundred and nineteen Iranian patients (female to male ratio 1.05) with NP were enrolled (mean age, 38 ± 11 years). Recurrence of nasal polyposis was 64.7%. OAC was performed in all cases; 43.79% cases had aspirin hypersensitivity. In addition, OFC tests determined that 69.9% of patients had salicylate food allergy. Salicylate food intolerance was significantly higher in NP cases with AERD than in aspirin tolerant patients (p<0.05). Yet, positive skin prick test was not associated with NP recurrence and AERD. Atopy and NSAID exacerbated respiratory disease; therefore, they can both be considered as predictors of NP recurrence. Our study also showed that salicylate food intolerance was associated with AERD in nasal polyposis.

Kidney stones are common after bariatric surgery

PurposeTo evaluate the long-term outcomes of revisional malabsorptive bariatric surgery.Materials and MethodsMalabsorptive bariatric procedures are increasingly performed in the revisional setting. We collated and analysed prospectively recorded data for all patients who underwent a revisional Biliopancreatic diversion + / − duodenal switch (BPD + / − DS) over a 17-year period.ResultsWe identified 102 patients who underwent a revisional BPD + / − DS. Median follow-up was 7 years (range 1–17). There were 21 (20.6%) patients permanently lost to follow-up at a median of 5 years postoperatively. Mean total weight loss since the revisional procedure of 22.7% (SD 13.4), 20.1% (SD 10.5) and 17.6% (SD 5.5) was recorded at 5, 10 and 15 years respectively. At the time of revisional surgery, 23 (22.5%) patients had diabetes and 16 (15.7%) had hypercholesterolaemia with remission of these occurring in 20 (87%) and 7 (44%) patients respectively. Nutritional deficiencies occurred in 82 (80.4%) patients, with 10 (9.8%) patients having severe deficiencies requiring periods of parenteral nutrition. Seven (6.9%) patients required limb lengthening or reversal procedures. There were 16 (15.7%) patients who experienced a complication within 30 days, including 3 (2.9%) anastomotic leaks. Surgery was required in 42 (41.2%) patients for late complications.ConclusionRevisional malabsorptive bariatric surgery induces significant long-term weight loss and comorbidity resolution. High rates of temporary and permanent attrition from follow-up are of major concern, given the high prevalence of nutritional deficiencies. These data question the long-term safety of malabsorptive bariatric procedures due to the inability to ensure compliance with nutritional supplementation and long-term follow-up requirements.Graphical abstractKey points• Revisional bariatric surgery workload is increasing• Revisional malabsorptive surgery is efficacious for weight loss and comorbidity resolution• Revisional malabsorptive surgery is associated with high rates of nutritional deficiencies• Attrition from follow-up in this specific cohort of patients is of particular concern due to the risk of undiagnosed and untreated nutritional deficienciesSupplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-022-06019-7.

Development of a Standardized Methodology for Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge Patients with Brittle Asthma and Perceived Food Intolerance

Neonatal Outcomes and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies After Maternal Bariatric Surgery.

Bariatric surgery – not to be taken lightly

Worldwide the obesity epidemic is becoming one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. The rates of bariatric surgery procedures are sharply increasing. Today it is the only treatment option for a substantial and durable long-term weight loss. However, bariatric surgery is not a guarantee of successful weight loss and maintenance. For all patients undergoing bariatric surgery, education and clinical management to prevent and detect nutritional deficiencies are recommended. Particularly for patients undergoing malabsorptive procedures, the management of potential nutritional deficiencies is important. Strategies should be employed to compensate for food intolerance aiming at risk reduction for nutritional deficiencies. All patients should receive care from a multidisciplinary team and be considered for comprehensive perioperative program for nutrition and lifestyle management.

Comment on: Duodenal diverted sleeve gastrectomy with ileal interposition does not cause biliary salt malabsorption

Impact of Bariatric Surgery Upon the Incidence of Distal Radius Fractures Among Patients With Severe Obesity.

Background: Bariatric surgery is associated with a significant improvement in depressive mood in the initial postoperative years, but the maintenance of the improvement is under debate.Aim: To explore the association between bariatric surgery and major depressive disorder (MDD) in a 12-year nationwide cohort study.Method: Using the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan, we identified 2302 patients who underwent bariatric surgery in 2001–2009. These patients were matched by propensity score to 6493 obese patients who did not receive bariatric surgery. We followed the surgical and control cohorts until death, any diagnosis of MDD or 31 December 2012. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to calculate the relative risk of MDD in those who received bariatric surgery.Results: Overall, there was a 1.70-fold (95% CI: 1.27–2.27) higher risk of MDD in the surgical group. Subjects receiving malabsorptive procedures showed a higher risk of MDD (3.01, 95% CI: 1.78–5.09) than those receiving restrictive procedures (1.51, 95% CI: 1.10–2.07). Stratified by follow-up period, there was a higher risk of MDD in the surgical group (2.92, 95% CI: 1.75–4.88) than in the restrictive group four years after bariatric surgery.Conclusions: Bariatric surgery was significantly associated with an elevated risk of MDD.KEY MESSAGESBariatric surgery is associated with a significant improvement in depressive mood in the initial postoperative years, but the improvement is not maintained. Less is known about the relationship between bariatric surgery and risk of major depressive disorder.This was the first nationwide cohort study which found that bariatric surgery was significantly associated with an elevated risk of MDD (aHR: 1.70; CI: 1.27–2.27), mainly with malabsorptive procedures (aHR: 3.01; CI: 1.78–5.09) and at time points more than four years after surgery (aHR: 2.92; CI: 1.75–4.88) compared with the risk in matched controls. These findings imply an association between long-term malabsorption and the postoperative incidence of MDD.Long-term malabsorption might be related to the incidence of major depressive disorder after bariatric surgery. The possible causal relationship between nutritional deficiency after bariatric surgery and major depressive disorder warrants further investigation.

Bariatric and metabolic surgery has become the clinical hot topic of the treatment of metabolic syndromes including obesity and diabetes mellitus, but how to choose the appropriate surgical procedure remains the difficult problem in clinical practice. Clinical guidelines of American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery(ASMBS)(version 2013) introduced the procedures of bariatric and metabolic surgery mainly including biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch(BPD-DS), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG). To choose the appropriate bariatric and metabolic procedure, the surgeons should firstly understand the indications and the contraindications of each procedure. Procedure choice should also consider personal condition (body mass index, comorbidities and severity of diabetes), family and socioeconomic status (postoperative follow-up attendance, understanding of potential surgical risk of gastrectomy and patient's will), family and disease history (patients with high risk of gastric cancer should avoid LRYGB; patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease should avoid LSG) and associated personal factors of surgeons. With the practice of bariatric and metabolic surgery, the defects, especially long-term complications, of different procedures were found. For example, LRYGB resulted in higher incidence of postoperative anemia and marginal ulcer, high risk of gastric cancer as well as the requirement of vitamin supplementation and regular follow-up. Though LSG has lower surgical risk, its efficacy of diabetes mellitus remission and long-term weight loss are inferior to the LRYGB. These results pose challenges to the surgeons to balance the benefits and risks of the bariatric procedures. A lot of factors can affect the choice of bariatric and metabolic procedure. Surgeons should choose the procedure according to patient's condition with the consideration of the choice of patients. The bariatric and metabolic surgery not only manages the diabetes mellitus and weight loss, but also results in the reconstruction of gastrointestinal tract and side effect. Postoperative surgical complications and nutritional deficiency should also be considered. Thereby, individualized bariatric procedure with the full consideration of each related factors is the ultimate objective of bariatric and metabolic surgery.

Patients with a functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) frequently report abdominal discomfort and bloating after ingesting specific foods. However, evidence on the relationship between foods and symptoms is lacking. In addition, the diagnosis of food hypersensitivity and food intolerance does not seem to be established yet. Food hypersensitivity can be divided into immunologically mediated and non-immunologically mediated forms. The immunologically mediated forms are specifically termed food allergies, whereas the non-immunologically mediated forms are referred to as food intolerances. Various diagnostic tools are required to make an accurate diagnosis of a food allergy or a food intolerance. First, a thorough examination of the history and basic tests to rule out other organic diseases are needed. Next, diagnostic tests for immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergies are required and diseases, such as celiac disease and lactose intolerance, should be differentiated. A diagnosis for non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is also required. A double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dietary challenge test can be used for diagnosing NCGS and food intolerance. Diagnostic tests for food intolerance, in which scientific evidence is lacking, may result in a misdiagnosis of food hypersensitivity or food intolerance in patients with a FGID. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis of food hypersensitivity or food intolerance based on reliable tests is required. Keywords: Food intolerance; Food hypersensitivity; Gastrointestinal diseases 중심 단어: 음식 과민증; 음식 불내증; 기능성 위장관 질환

Recommendations for obesity management and prevention have come a long way.

Secondary Kwashiorkor: A Rare Complication of Gastric Bypass Surgery

The aim of this study is to evaluate short- and long-term consequences in children born to women after different bariatric surgery (BS) procedures. A questionnaire survey was given to the mothers referred from 1994 to 2019 to our center for pregnancy and delivery management after BS procedures: (a) malabsorptive surgery, (b) restrictive procedures, and (c) combined restrictive-malabsorptive procedures. Data from 74 children born after BS, aged 0month to 12years, were analyzed. The prevalence of children with underweight was 5.4%, normal weight 59.5%, overweight 16.2%, and obesity 18.9%. The prevalence of obesity was higher in children pre-school aged than that in school-aged ones. Neurodevelopmental disorders were more frequent if maternal BMI before bariatric surgery was ≥ 41kg/m2 (p = 0.008), as well as if the pregnancy occurred less than 18months after BS (p = 0.028). In school-aged children conceived within 18months after BS, the highest risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (p = 0.028) and overweight (p = 0.018) was observed. The prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders was much higher for small for gestational age babies (p = 0.048). Children born after biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) showed less maternal breastfeeding, shorter breastfeeding duration, more overweight, and more occurrence of atopic dermatitis in comparison with children born after other bariatric procedures. Postnatal health in children born to women after BS was impaired by long-term consequences and by other diseases later in life. Children born after BPD were particularly at higher risk for short and long term consequences when compared to children born after other BS procedures.