Abstract
SummaryBackgroundIn the PATHWAY-2 study of resistant hypertension, spironolactone reduced blood pressure substantially more than conventional antihypertensive drugs. We did three substudies to assess the mechanisms underlying this superiority and the pathogenesis of resistant hypertension.MethodsPATHWAY-2 was a randomised, double-blind crossover trial done at 14 UK primary and secondary care sites in 314 patients with resistant hypertension. Patients were given 12 weeks of once daily treatment with each of placebo, spironolactone 25–50 mg, bisoprolol 5–10 mg, and doxazosin 4–8 mg and the change in home systolic blood pressure was assessed as the primary outcome. In our three substudies, we assessed plasma aldosterone, renin, and aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) as predictors of home systolic blood pressure, and estimated prevalence of primary aldosteronism (substudy 1); assessed the effects of each drug in terms of thoracic fluid index, cardiac index, stroke index, and systemic vascular resistance at seven sites with haemodynamic monitoring facilities (substudy 2); and assessed the effect of amiloride 10–20 mg once daily on clinic systolic blood pressure during an optional 6–12 week open-label runout phase (substudy 3). The PATHWAY-2 trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2008–007149–30, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02369081.FindingsOf the 314 patients in PATHWAY-2, 269 participated in one or more of the three substudies: 126 in substudy 1, 226 in substudy 2, and 146 in substudy 3. Home systolic blood pressure reduction by spironolactone was predicted by ARR (r2=0·13, p<0·0001) and plasma renin (r2=0·11, p=0·00024). 42 patients had low renin concentrations (predefined as the lowest tertile of plasma renin), of which 31 had a plasma aldosterone concentration greater than the mean value for all 126 patients (250 pmol/L). Thus, 31 (25% [95% CI 17–33]) of 126 patients were deemed to have inappropriately high aldosterone concentrations. Thoracic fluid content was reduced by 6·8% from baseline (95% CI 4·0 to 8·8; p<0·0001) with spironolactone, but not other treatments. Amiloride (10 mg once daily) reduced clinic systolic blood pressure by 20·4 mm Hg (95% CI 18·3–22·5), compared with a reduction of 18·3 mm Hg (16·2–20·5) with spironolactone (25 mg once daily). No serious adverse events were recorded, and adverse symptoms were not systematically recorded after the end of the double-blind treatment. Mean plasma potassium concentrations increased from 4·02 mmol/L (95% CI 3·95–4·08) on placebo to 4·50 (4·44–4·57) on amiloride (p<0·0001).InterpretationOur results suggest that resistant hypertension is commonly a salt-retaining state, most likely due to inappropriate aldosterone secretion. Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade by spironolactone overcomes the salt retention and resistance of hypertension to treatment. Amiloride seems to be as effective an antihypertensive as spironolactone, offering a substitute treatment for resistant hypertension.FundingBritish Heart Foundation and UK National Institute for Health Research.
Highlights
Resistant hypertension is defined as a blood pressure that is uncontrolled despite treatment with at least three blood pressure-lowering drugs, including a diuretic, usually including an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and a calcium channel blocker (CCB), and after exclusion of treatable secondary causes of hypertension.[1]
Evidence before this study We previously reported the results of the PATHWAY-2 randomised controlled trial, which showed that low-dose spironolactone (25–50 mg daily), when added to standard blood pressure-lowering drugs, was substantially more effective at lowering blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension than placebo or alternative blood pressure-lowering drugs
Study design and participants PATHWAY-2 was a 12-month, double-blind, placebocontrolled, randomised, crossover trial done at 12 secondary care sites and two primary care sites in the UK, in patients aged 18–79 years with systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mm Hg and home systolic average blood pressure of at least 130 mm Hg despite treatment with maximum tolerated doses of three blood pressure-lowering drugs
Summary
Resistant hypertension is defined as a blood pressure that is uncontrolled despite treatment with at least three blood pressure-lowering drugs, including a diuretic, usually including an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and a calcium channel blocker (CCB), and after exclusion of treatable secondary causes of hypertension.[1]. Evidence before this study We previously reported the results of the PATHWAY-2 randomised controlled trial, which showed that low-dose spironolactone (25–50 mg daily), when added to standard blood pressure-lowering drugs, was substantially more effective at lowering blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension than placebo or alternative blood pressure-lowering drugs (bisoprolol or doxazosin). Our search strategy included reports of randomised controlled trials as well as open and observational studies of drug treatment of resistant hypertension that included any data analysing mechanisms and pathophysiology of resistant hypertension or the use of amiloride. Findings from two observational studies had suggested that plasma renin concentrations were often more suppressed than anticipated in patients with resistant hypertension, consistent with this being a sodium-retaining and volume-expanded state. Results of many studies have shown the efficacy of low-dose (2·5–5·0 mg) amiloride added to thiazide, including reduction of morbidity and mortality. We have previously reported the efficacy of high-dose (10–40 mg) amiloride in treated hypertension, but amiloride has not previously been compared with spironolactone or other drugs in patients with resistant hypertension
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.