Abstract

The biodiversity of natural or semi-natural native, old oak woodlands have high conservation importance, especially in landscapes of monocultural forest plantations and arable fields. With a wider variety of microhabitats and foraging sources, such old oak forests can provide essential habitat for native forest bird communities. We conducted a study using bird point counts to compare the forest bird communities of old pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) remnants with native and non-native plantations in central Hungary in a landscape of mostly arable fields, settlements, and monocultural plantations. Avian surveys were carried out in old oak forest remnants, middle-aged oak, white poplar (Populus alba), hybrid poplar (Populus × euramericana), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), and pine (Pinus spp.) plantations. Fieldwork has been carried out in nine study sites, where all six habitat types were represented (with a few exceptions), to determine total abundance, species richness, Shannon–Wiener diversity, species evenness, dominant and indicator species, and guild abundances. We found that old oak forest remnants were the most diverse habitats among the studied forest types, while hybrid poplar and pine plantations exhibited the lowest avian biodiversity. The avian guilds most sensitive to the loss of old oak forest remnants were ground foragers, bark foragers, cavity-nesters, residents, and Mediterranean migratory birds. Native habitats were more diverse than non-native plantations. Our results suggest that it is important to conserve all remaining high biodiversity old oak stands and to avoid clear-cutting of monocultural plantations in favour of practices such as mixed-species plantations, longer rotation lengths, or retention forestry.

Highlights

  • Project funding: This work was supported financially by the projects (LIFE16NAT/IT/000245); (OeAD-GmbH - ICM2020-00204); and GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00019.The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.comCorresponding editor: Yanbo Hu.The vast majority of natural forests are altered worldwide by urbanization, agriculture, and various kinds of forest management practices

  • Species richness is higher in natural forests than in commercial plantations and both species richness and abundance are significantly higher in complex than in structurally simple plantations (Nájera and Simonetti 2010)

  • We found overall significant differences between habitat types in total abundance (χ2 = 60.966, df = 5, P < 0.0001, species richness (χ2 = 44.522, df = 5, P < 0.0001), Shannon–Wiener diversity (χ2 = 42.205, df = 5, P < 0.0001) and species evenness (χ2 = 51.437, df = 5, P < 0.0001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The vast majority of natural forests are altered worldwide by urbanization, agriculture, and various kinds of forest management practices. Less than 1% of European forests remain natural. Natural forests have heterogeneous tree species and age composition, with multi-layered habitat structure and diverse microhabitats. Such elements make natural forests optimal habitats for forest-dwelling species. Among the numerous existing forest management practices, monocultural commercial tree plantations are considered to result in the poorest habitats for forest communities (Paillet et al 2010). Species richness is higher in natural forests than in commercial plantations and both species richness and abundance are significantly higher in complex than in structurally simple plantations (Nájera and Simonetti 2010).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call