Abstract

BackgroundStructural aspects and current practice about end-of-life (EOL) decisions in German intensive care units (ICUs) managed by anesthesiologists are unknown. A survey among intensive care anesthesiologists has been conducted to explore current practice, barriers and opinions on EOL decisions in ICU.MethodsIn November 2015, all members of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Association of German Anesthesiologists (BDA) were asked to participate in an online survey to rate the presence or absence and the importance of 50 items. Answers were grouped into three categories considering implementation and relevance: Category 1 reflects high implementation and high relevance, Category 2 low and low, and Category 3 low and high.ResultsFive-hundred and forty-one anesthesiologists responded. Only four items reached ≥90% agreement as being performed “yes, always” or “mostly”, and 29 items were rated “very” or “more important”. A profound discrepancy between current practice and attributed importance was revealed. Twenty-eight items attributed to Category 1, six to Category 2 and sixteen to Category 3. Items characterizing the most urgent need for improvement (Category 3) referred to patient outcome data, preparation of health care directives and interdisciplinary discussion, standard operating procedures, implementation of practical instructions and inclusion of nursing staff and families in the process.ConclusionThe present survey affirms an urgent need for improvement in EOL practice in German ICUs focusing on advanced care planning, distinct aspects of changing goals of care, implementation of standard operating procedures, continuing education and reporting of outcome data.

Highlights

  • Structural aspects and current practice about end-of-life (EOL) decisions in German intensive care units (ICUs) managed by anesthesiologists are unknown

  • The present survey reveals an urgent need for improvement in EOL practice in German ICUs

  • A shift from unsatisfactory Category 3 to sufficient Category 1 may be enabled by generating awareness regarding deficits in EOL care and deliver already available tools via specialist societies, such as the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Structural aspects and current practice about end-of-life (EOL) decisions in German intensive care units (ICUs) managed by anesthesiologists are unknown. A survey among intensive care anesthesiologists has been conducted to explore current practice, barriers and opinions on EOL decisions in ICU. An updated summary of published statements on EOL care in the ICU from national societies has currently been presented, highlighting commonalities and differences within and between international regions [1]. The World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine has encouraged their member societies to lead the debate and to develop national guidelines and recommendations regarding EOL care in the ICU within each country [1]. Since the status of structural aspects and the relevance of EOL in German ICUs are unknown, we aimed to explore current practice, barriers and opinions on EOL decisions. The hypotheses of the present survey were: 1.) EOL standard operating procedures (SOPs) are not regularly used in ICU’s and 2.) There is a discrepancy between the actual (implementation of items) and the desired status (importance of items) on EOL decisions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call