Abstract
ABSTRACTGlobally, sexuality education is framed as a key programmatic strategy for achieving HIV prevention among youth. In particular, sexuality education is positioned as a way to address gender inequalities and promote youth empowerment in relation to gendered identities. In this paper, I argue that the focus on what content should be taught and what is the effectiveness of that content serves to mask how sexuality education itself is always a political project. Specifically, I problematise a neo-liberal 'political rationality,' following Wendy Brown, operating through sexuality education in this particular globalised moment. Drawing on data from an ethnographic study conducted in South Africa, I use the notion of encounters with gender to mobilise understanding of gender with(in) the inevitable risks of knowing and being known through educational research and practice. I argue that holding sexuality education responsible to the complexity of lived lives necessitates proposing alternative political rationalities to guide its encounters.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.