Abstract
Abstract In this paper, I seek to provide insight into Rudolf Bultmann’s work by engaging with it through the lenses of biblical theology. To do so, I first describe the presuppositions behind Bultmann’s approach to biblical theology by discussing three polarities crucial to his thinking: (1) mythology versus science, (2) Historie versus Geschichte, and (3) objective knowledge versus revelation. I then explore Bultmann’s exegetical methods under three headings: (1) historical-critical methods, (2) demythologizing, and (3) existentialist interpretation. Lastly, I locate Bultmann within the field of biblical theology by concluding that he was a theologian who (1) rejected the unity of the Scriptures in favor of their diversity, (2) bridged the gap between history and theology through prioritizing Geschichte over Historie, (3) included extra-canonical materials within the scope of biblical theology, and (4) viewed the kerygma as normative in an existentialist fashion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
