Abstract
Abstract The liquid chromatographic enantiomerPDF separation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was performed on covalently immobilized chiral stationary phases (CSPs) (Chiralpak IA, Chiralpak IB, and Chiralpak IC) and coated-type CSPs (Chiralpak AD and Chiralcel OD) derived from polysaccharide derivatives. The chromatographic conditions were as follows: the flow rate was 1.0 ml min−1, the detection wavelength was 254 nm, and the standard mobile phase was 2-propanol/hexane/trifluoroacetic acid on all CSPs. A mobile phase of 2-propanol/hexane/trifluoroacetic acid = 10:90:0.1 (v/v) and 2:98:0.1 (v/v) were used on Chiralpak AD and Chiralcel OD of coated-type CSPs, respectively. Several solvents (dichloromethane, tetrahydrofuran, and ethyl acetate) in the mobile phase were used on covalently immobilized CSPs (Chiralpak IA, Chiralpak IB, and Chiralpak IC) and, therefore, solvent versatility of the covalently immobilized CSPs for enantiomer separation of NSAIDs was shown. Also, chromatographic comparisons for enantiomer resolution of these analytes were made on amylose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) derived CSPs (Chiralpak IA and Chiralpak AD) and cellulose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) derived CSPs (Chiralpak IB and Chiralcel OD), respectively. The results indicated that Chiralpak IA and Chiralpak IB showed generally lower enantiomer separation than Chiralpak AD and Chiralcel OD, respectively.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.