Abstract

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes have proliferated across Europe and other parts of the world in recent years and have contributed to increasing material and energy recovery from waste streams. Currently, EPR schemes do not provide sufficient incentives for moving towards the higher levels of the waste hierarchy, e.g. by reducing the amounts of waste through incentivising the design of products with longer lifespans and by enhancing reuse activities through easier collection and repair of end-of-life products. Nevertheless, several municipalities and regional actors around Europe are increasingly promoting reuse activities through a variety of initiatives. Furthermore, even in the absence of legal drivers, many producer responsibility organisations (PROs), who execute their members’ responsibilities in EPR schemes, are considering promoting reuse and have initiated a number of pilot projects. A product group that has been identified as having high commercial potential for reuse is white goods, but the development of large-scale reuse of white goods seems unlikely unless a series of legal and organisational barriers are effectively addressed. Through an empirical investigation with relevant stakeholders, based on interviews, and the analysis of two case studies of PROs that developed criteria for allowing reusers to access their end-of-life white goods, this contribution presents insights on drivers and barriers for the repair and reuse of white goods in EPR schemes and discusses potential interventions that could facilitate the upscale of reuse activities. Concluding, although the reuse potential for white goods is high, the analysis highlights the currently insufficient policy landscape for incentivising reuse and the need for additional interventions to make reuse feasible as a mainstream enterprise.

Highlights

  • A key strategy for reaching a circular economy (CE) is to keep the value of materials, products and components at their highest utility level [1]

  • This paper focuses on the case of preparation for reuse of white goods from producer responsibility organisation (PRO) waste streams, including repair, refurbishment and reuse operations of end-oflife (EOL) products in the wider setting of extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes

  • We present in detail the case studies, outlining the proposed criteria that PROs are planning to implement in relation to Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) streams for enabling further reuse activities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A key strategy for reaching a circular economy (CE) is to keep the value of materials, products and components at their highest utility level [1]. The purpose of the background literature review was to anchor the present contribution into what is known on the barriers and drivers of repair, refurbishment and reuse and to direct the interview study, as well as enhancing the analysis of the interviews. Both academic literature and documents from authorities and relevant actors were sought for, in order to combine knowledge on the state of the art on WEEE reuse and which laws and regulations apply. The geographical scope was limited to the Nordic countries and Europe

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.