Abstract

Translational research is progressing toward combined genomics and proteomics analyses of small and precious samples. In our analyses of spinal cord material, we systematically evaluated disruption and extraction techniques to determine an optimum process for the coupled analysis of RNA and protein from a single 5-mm segment of tissue. Analyses of these distinct molecular species were performed using microarrays and high resolution two-dimensional gels, respectively. Comparison of standard homogenization with automated frozen disruption (AFD) identified negligible differences in the relative abundance of genes (44) with all genes identified by either process. Analysis on either the Affymetrix or Applied Biosystems Inc. gene array platforms provided good correlations between the extraction techniques. In contrast, the AFD technique enabled identification of more unique proteins from spinal cord tissue than did standard homogenization. Furthermore use of an optimized CHAPS/urea extraction provided better protein recovery, as shown by quantitative two-dimensional gel analyses, than did solvent precipitation during TRIzol-based RNA extraction. Thus, AFD of tissue samples followed by protein and RNA isolation from separate aliquots of the frozen powdered sample is the most effective route to ensure full, quantitative analyses of both molecular entities.

Highlights

  • Translational research is progressing toward combined genomics and proteomics analyses of small and precious samples

  • To most effectively enable fully coupled, quantitative genomics (RNA/microarray) and proteomics (2DE) analyses, we systematically evaluated widely used tissue handling, homogenization, and extraction techniques (Fig. 1)

  • From samples processed by automated frozen disruption (AFD), half of the resulting powder was processed by TRIzol extraction for RNA and protein analyses (AFD-T), whereas the other half was processed directly for protein analysis (AFD-D)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Translational research is progressing toward combined genomics and proteomics analyses of small and precious samples. In our analyses of spinal cord material, we systematically evaluated disruption and extraction techniques to determine an optimum process for the coupled analysis of RNA and protein from a single 5-mm segment of tissue. Analyses of these distinct molecular species were performed using microarrays and high resolution two-dimensional gels, respectively. A practical consideration in such coupled studies is whether the same sample can be used for both analyses (the “ideal” situation) or whether the nature of one analysis or the other necessitates the parallel generation of a separate sample This consideration is even more critical for researchers investigating molecular processes in exceedingly small, valuable, and/or difficult to obtain biological material. Can a single preparation method yield the same result as separate, 1574 Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 6.9

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call