Abstract

Polythiophenes (PTs) constitute a diverse array of promising materials for conducting polymer applications. However, many of the synthetic methods to produce PTs have been optimized only for the prototypical alkyl-substituted example poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT). Improvement of these methods beyond P3HT is key to enabling the widespread application of PTs. In this work, P3HT and two ether-substituted PTs poly(2-dodecyl-2H,3H-thieno[3,4-b][1,4]dioxine) (PEDOT-C12) and poly(3,4-bis(hexyloxy)thiophene) (PBHOT) are synthesized by the FeCl3-initiated oxidative method under different conditions. Polymerization was carried out according to a common literature procedure (“reverse addition”) and a modified method (“standard addition”), which differ by the solvent system and the order of addition of reagents to the reaction mixture. Gel-permeation chromatography (GPC) was performed to determine the impact of the different methods on the molecular weights (Mw) and degree of polymerization (Xw) of the polymers relative to polystyrene standards. The standard addition method produced ether-substituted PTs with higher Mw and Xw than those produced using the reverse addition method for sterically unhindered monomers. For P3HT, the highest Mw and Xw were obtained using the reverse addition method. The results show the oxidation potential of the monomer and solution has the greatest impact on the yield and Xw obtained and should be carefully considered when optimizing the reaction conditions for different monomers.

Highlights

  • Polythiophenes are among the most widely researched classes of conducting polymers, owing to their remarkable stability towards oxygen and moisture [1,2]

  • We examine the FeCl3-initiated oxidative polymerization method and the impact of the order of reagent addition on the molecular weight and degree of polythe impact of the order of reagent addition on the molecular weight and degree of merization of 3-hexylthiophene, an alkyl-substituted PEDOT, and an alkoxy-substituted polymerization of 3-hexylthiophene, an alkyl-substituted PEDOT, and an alkoxy-substipolythiophene

  • The molecular weights (Mw) and Xw of these polymers agree with the trends observed in previously reported data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Polythiophenes are among the most widely researched classes of conducting polymers, owing to their remarkable stability towards oxygen and moisture [1,2]. It is important to note that there is considerable variability in the molecular weights reported for polymers prepared under similar conditions [20,36], for example, P3HT. It is in important to note is considerable in the weights this variability can be attributed to discrepancies between the amounts of solvent used and whether the solvent contains a radical inhibitor (for example, ethanol in chloroform) This variability can be attributed to discrepancies the amounts of solvent used for polymers prepared under similar [20,36], forthe example, synmolecular weight data of and relevant alkylconditions andbetween ether-substituted polythiophenes.

Previously molecular weight data of
Weight-average
Weight-average w
Methods
H NMR spectra of EDOT-C12 zation detailsincan found in the Supplementary
Monomer Synthesis
Synthesis of EDOT-C12
General Procedure—Reverse Addition Oxidative Polymerization
PEDOT-C12—Reverse
Different
Below the
General Procedure—Standard Addition Oxidative Polymerization
Results and Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call