Abstract
Abstract: This article aims to defend the principles of Natural Law (legal connotations of natural law) using dialectics (and rhetoric). First, different contemporary currents (constructivist and neo-constitutionalist) are approached distinguishing between principles and rules or norms. As for these “principles”, there are different problems to justify them rationally, being in many cases mere postulates that are proclaimed to justify the entire structure of later action. Finally, we deal with the principles of Natural Law immediately grasped (by abstractive induction) of reality, by reason of their evidence (the predicate is contained in the subject) by practical moral reason ( first ratio ), founded on human nature, in the very human essence as the principle of its operations, known by the metaphysical speculative reason ( last ratio ).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
