Abstract
In Spanish, third person object and dative clitics have a number of contrasting properties. Dative clitics allow doubling, and this is one of the reasons why it is interpreted as agreement. This chapter argues that dative clitics do not uniformly represent agreement. Specifically, when there is no overt doubling DP, dative clitics are incorporated determiners. Evidence for this proposal is found in DOM. When the clitic is doubled by a DP, the object cannot receive DOM; however, when it is not, DOM can, and (for most speakers) must be assigned to the object when conditions for DOM assignment are met. Evidence can also be found in the behavior of dative clitics in some laísta dialects. In these dialects, laísmo only shows up in those contexts where accusative Case can be assigned. Since accusative clitics are incorporated determiners, they are not compatible with doubling contexts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.