Abstract

PurposeThe traditional concept of people’s participation through their representatives is changing to the mechanism of direct participation of community people in the local governing process. In coupling with these, the Constitution of Bangladesh and the local government acts guarantee to foster the direct participation of people in the formation of local bodies and development programs. The purpose of this paper is to explore the avenues of people’s participation in local government, particularly the Union Parishad (UP) in Bangladesh, and to evaluate the empowerment of marginalized community through those avenues.Design/methodology/approachUsing a broad descriptive and analytical approach, this paper evaluates the relationship between participation and empowerment of local community based on the review of secondary sources of information.FindingsThe local government institutions, particularly UP, has existed many mechanisms through which people participate in decision-making process. It is also believed that participation of community people in local government institutions is not only an opportunity for them but also an apparatus of empowerment. Hence, the process of empowerment is entrenched in the notion of participation. It is evident that the people at grass root level have been participating in UP in diverse arrangements, but the effectiveness of these participations in terms of empowerment is still meager and even lack.Originality/valueThough a long time has passed after introducing these participatory mechanisms, very few studies have undertaken to assess the people’s participation in local government. Additionally, no single initiative was undertaken to assess how empowerment of marginalized people happened through these initiatives as empowering community people is the key objective of it.

Highlights

  • Popular participation in governance that affects their lives is an indispensable part in contemporary democratic society

  • Popular participation in Union Parishad (UP) activities is essential to develop the accountability of the local authority, make the program transparent and force the authority to follow the local laws

  • All participation does not have equal weight or influence and the public is apathetic about involvement in local governance (Hamilton, 2012)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Popular participation in governance that affects their lives is an indispensable part in contemporary democratic society. In Bangladesh, UPs have several direct (when citizens are personally involved and actively engaged) and indirect (when citizens elect others to represent them) avenues of popular participation which make the local government more accountable and transparent to the community. The key objective of the courts is to provide and ensure justice for all at root level as well as protect rural poor people through empowering community people, women, poor and disadvantaged groups to seek remedies for injustices (Sarker, 2013) All these provisions are made for involving people in the decision-making process, and in ensuring accountability and transparency of the total process. The UP is the only local government body that has been operating for decades with regular elections (Sarker, 2003)

Female
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.