Abstract

abstract In exploring popular mechanisms and institutions, Ethiopia reveals many complexities that are very convincingly ‘pre-colonial’. Since 1995, the Ethiopian Constitution has given due recognition to the traditional or cultural ways of resolving conflicts as practised in all ethnic groups. It is believed that the formal (constitutional) and informal (customary) justice systems can work in parallel and in co-operation. However, many argue that customary law is discriminatory and undermines the constitutional commitment to gender equality as expressed in the Constitution. This Briefing questions the acknowledgment of ‘customary law’ in Ethiopia, and highlights its implication by looking at the experience of women in the remote, rural Sebat Bet Gurage. It will be shown how the Gurage ethnic group uses conservative and patriarchal customary mediation practices to resolve marital conflicts and deny women equal human rights. The Briefing also emphasises the need to problematise women's consent in patriarchal societies that undermine their agency.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.