Abstract

Public administration seriously harms itself by delivering conflicting messages regarding its receptivity to reinvention of government. As a result, the profession encourages the very citizen frustration and cynicism it seeks to avoid. A major contributor to this unsettling state of affairs is the divergent viewpoints that divide the profession over reinvention’s managerial principles—particularly separating the world of theory from practice. That is, many theoretical academic works reject reinvention as being ideologically incompatible with safeguarded values, principally, democratic participation and social equity. Yet, there are numerous empirical works that amply attest to reinvention’s affirmation of those values in practice. The paper examines the differences between the two positions. It illustrates that many of the arguments employed to dispel reinvention often misrepresent it. The paper concludes that the conflicting views need to be resolved by focusing research attention on theory-grounded practice—as a precursor to building citizen trust in public service.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.