Abstract

Land cover change analyses are common and, especially in the absence of explanatory variables, they are mainly carried out by employing qualitative methods such as transition matrices or raster operations. These methods do not provide any estimation of the statistical significance of the changes, or the uncertainty of the model and data, and are usually limited in supporting explicit biological/ecological interpretation of the processes determining the changes. Here we show how the original nearest-neighbour contingency table, proposed by Dixon to evaluate spatial segregation, has been extended to the temporal domain to map the intensity, statistical significance and uncertainty of land cover changes. This index was then employed to quantify the changes in cork oak forest cover between 1998 and 2016 in the Sa Serra region of Sardinia (Italy). The method showed that most statistically significant cork oak losses were concentrated in the centre of Sa Serra and characterised by high intensity. A spatial binomial-logit generalised linear model estimated the probability of changes occurring in the area but not the type of change. We show how the spatio-temporal Dixon’s index can be an attractive alternative to other land cover change analysis methods, since it provides a robust statistical framework and facilitates direct biological/ecological interpretation.

Highlights

  • The cork oak forests of Sa Serra in Sardinia are considered historical forests of high heritage value

  • Previous works focused on developing the index for species interactions studies[18,37] and for different geometric configuration of the points in space[44,57], but not for a time dimension or for local estimations of the index

  • Applying Dixon’s index to time opens up a multitude of study areas for its possible application; from land cover/use change to clustering analysis, to species interaction and distribution analyses[16]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cork oak forests of Sa Serra in Sardinia are considered historical forests of high heritage value. Despite the large number of tests for marked point processes, few can handle bivariate or multi-variate interactions For this reason, we decided to adapt Dixon’s index of segregation[18], which is based on a nearest neighbour contingency table, on both spatial and temporal domains, in order to identify and quantify cork oak forest cover changes. The null hypothesis stated above can be reformulated as: within the study region there is no association nor segregation in cork oak forest cover changes between the two surveys (1998 and 2016) This is equivalent to stating that any changes are those expected as a result of random labelling[18]. Dixon’s index of segregation is easy to interpret and allows the identification of segregation, association or none of the above based on a pre-defined significance level[38]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.