Abstract

<p class="MsoBlockText" style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan;"><span style="font-style: normal; mso-bidi-font-style: italic;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">We hypothesize that satisfied employees lead to higher returns for shareholders.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>In particular, we investigate whether inclusion on Fortune magazine’s list of “100 Best Companies to Work For” leads to increases in wealth for shareholders.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>We find no announcement effect associated with the list release date.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Although we do find that a subset of firms named to the list in one year generate higher returns (than a matched sample) the following year, we conclude that, ex ante, investors would be unable to consistently profit from any information provided by inclusion on the list.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Tests of returns of companies that are dropped from the Fortune list indicate no abnormal performance.</span></span></span></p>

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.