Abstract
The previous five chapters have traced the impact of the Vienna Circle on the study of language. The approaches discussed were in many ways very different from each other, but they shared both an underlying dissatisfaction with some aspects of what the Vienna Circle had said about language and an impetus to study it in a more genuinely and justifiably empirical manner. According to the usual, questionable divisions between academic subjects, they all belong to the field of philosophy. During the twentieth and into the twenty-first centuries, many accounts of how language should be studied have of course been developed in the emergent field of linguistics.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
