Empirical Suitability of Scoring Systems of Observational Techniques for Repetitive Movements Based on Discomfort.

Abstract

This study empirically investigated the effects of repetitive movements of body parts through an experiment, and evaluated the suitability of the scoring systems of the existing observational methods for repetitive movements, based on the experimental results. Eighteen healthy college students participated in the experiment to assess discomfort, wherein joint movement, its repetition, and external load were used as independent variables. Postural loads for 16 postures used in the experiment were assessed using rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) and loading on the entire body assessment (LEBA). Three independent variables, joint motion, its repetition, and external load, as well as the interaction between motion repetition and external load, had significant effects on discomfort. Joint motion and external load significantly affected the RULA grand score, whereas all three independent variables affected the LEBA score. This finding may indicate that LEBA more accurately reflects the effect of repetitive body part movements. Additionally, the scoring systems for repetitive back motions by quick exposure check (QEC) and for repetitive wrist motions via a risk assessment and management tool for manual handling proactively II (RAMP II) may be reasonable based on the results of this study. The findings of this study can be used as reference information for better evaluation of postural loads assessed using the existing observational techniques, and as useful baseline data for the development of a new observational method to accurately assess stress caused by repetitive movements.