Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to investigate the relationship between some characteristics of corporations including firm size, financial leverage, profitability, firm age and the type of industry with social responsibility disclosure of firms listed on Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE); and second, to study the association between the level of corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) and some of the audit variables such as audit fees, audit tenure and audit firm’ size.Design/methodology/approachThe study population consists of 125 firms listed on the TSE during the years 2010–2015. Following Salehiet al. (2017), content analysis is used to measure the level of social responsibility disclosure, and hypotheses are performed using multiple regression analysis and R software.FindingsThe results represented that there is a positive significant relationship between a firm size and a firm age with the level of CSRD. However, there is a negative significant association between financial leverage and profitability with the level of CSRD. Given that CSRD is different among various industries and the type of industry can be an influential factor in CSRD, an industry type’ variable in the fourth hypothesis is of a type of index variable and has eight levels, of which the first level is ranked as the base level. Our findings showed that the level of CSRD at industries of machinery and appliances, production of metal products, food and beverage products, and textiles is lower than the baseline level (pharmacy). Nevertheless, companies in the fifth industry (mineral products) have a higher level of CSRD in comparison with the pharmacy industry. Moreover, the authors find that there is a significant positive connection between audit fees and CSRD. This implies that Iranian managers in an inflationary economy probably manage earnings when they provide more CSRDs, which leads to increase in the audit risk and audit fees.Practical implicationsNeedless to say, the findings of this paper will have practical implications for investors, auditors and other users of financial statements. First of all, this study will aware them of the fact that when a country faces economic sanctions and most of its companies are in financial strain investors should not consider the firms engaging in corporate social responsibility activities to behave morally and provide transparent financial reports. Second, the results will convince auditors to be conservative toward the firms that are financially distressed, for audit risk of them will be high. Thus, policymakers should be cautious concerning directors’ opportunistic actions and increase monitoring to enforce social obedience.Originality/valueThe turning point of this research is related to the time period of research related to firms that have faced severe financial problems due to economic sanctions. In fact, the study revealed another aspect of CSRD that could have negative consequences when managers are in financial strain and take opportunistic actions.

Highlights

  • Despite the fact that corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a new term, the idea of informing its emergence in the business world has always been recognized from the earliest times

  • 3.2 Research hypotheses test model In the research model, using the coefficient of β1–β5, we investigate some features of corporations including firm size, financial leverage, profitability, firm age and industry type with the level of corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) in Iranian market

  • The average CSRD index is equal to 23 percent

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the fact that corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a new term, the idea of informing its emergence in the business world has always been recognized from the earliest times. Nowadays, improved industrialization and increase in foreign investment have implications for corporate accountability, reporting on employee and ethical topics. Organizations have a dynamic role in financial markets and cannot limit their attention only to economic goals, and they must be focused on a more qualitative approach and pay attention to environmental responsibility practices through internal and external reports (Guthrie and Farneti, 2008). Investors and other stakeholders use environmental information in making their decisions. Extensive evidence shows that social and environmental information is useful for investors and other stakeholders’ decisions (Blacconiere and Patten, 1994; Richardson and Welker, 2001; Salehi et al, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.