Abstract

The management revue is a peer-reviewed interdisciplinary European journal publishing both qualitative and quantitative work as well as purely theoretical papers that advance the study of management, organisation and industrial relations.

Highlights

  • The article argues that empirical research on Human Resource Management creates a one-sided, distorted image of the reality of work and generates ideology

  • If it were the case that empirical Human Resource Management (HRM) research produced a one-sided, biased, and false image of reality, which, in addition, would be suitable to unilaterally affirm certain actions and values in particular for companies and managers and that the findings generally did not aid in improving conditions for the employees, it would be justified to say that HRM research generates ideology

  • The results indicate that a large part of HRM research in total, and of empirical research deals mainly with managers and experts or other highly qualified staff

Read more

Summary

Research objectives and approach

The thesis of this article is: the empirical research in Human Resource Management creates a wrong image of the reality of work. I contend that research in Human Resource Management (HRM) mainly focuses on economic aims and employer objectives and rather neglects employee interests as a starting point for research. Those variables are analysed which refer to work performance. If it were the case that empirical HRM research produced a one-sided, biased, and false image of reality, which, in addition, would be suitable to unilaterally affirm certain actions and values in particular for companies and managers and that the findings generally did not aid in improving conditions for the employees, it would be justified to say that HRM research generates ideology.

Analytical framework
The collectivity of statements
Concept of empirical HRM research
Ideological effect and the meaning of the social context
Analysis
Selectivity in research topics and questions
Plurality through dissent-oriented research or monistic consensus orientation?
Which persons are we dealing with?
Controlling the access to information – companies and interviewees
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.