Abstract

Abstract In this work, we have taken advantage of the most recent accurate stellar characterizations carried out using asteroseismology, eclipsing binaries and interferometry to evaluate a comprehensive set of empirical relations for the estimation of stellar masses and radii. We have gathered a total of 934 stars—of which around two-thirds are on the main sequence—that are characterized with different levels of precision, most of them having estimates of M, R, T eff, L, g, ρ, and [Fe/H]. We have deliberately used a heterogeneous sample (in terms of characterizing techniques and spectroscopic types) to reduce the influence of possible biases coming from the observation, reduction, and analysis methods used to obtain the stellar parameters. We have studied a total of 576 linear combinations of T eff, L, g, ρ, and [Fe/H] (and their logarithms) to be used as independent variables to estimate M or R. We have used an error-in-variables linear regression algorithm to extract the relations and to ensure the fair treatment of the uncertainties. We present a total of 38 new or revised relations that have an adj-R 2 regression statistic higher than 0.85, and a relative accuracy and precision better than 10% for almost all the cases. The relations cover almost all the possible combinations of observables, ensuring that, whatever list of observables is available, there is at least one relation for estimating the stellar mass and radius.

Highlights

  • The existence of empirical relations among some observable stellar characteristics is well known from the initial works of Hertzsprung (1923), Russell et al (1923), and Eddington (1926)

  • We have taken advantage of the most recent accurate stellar characterizations carried out using asteroseismology, eclipsing binaries (EB), and interferometry to evaluate a comprehensive set of empirical relations for the estimation of stellar masses and radii

  • We have gathered a total of 934 stars—of which almost two-thirds are on the main sequence—that are characterized with different levels of precision, most of them having estimates of M, R, Teff, L, g, ρ and [Fe/H]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The existence of empirical relations among some observable stellar characteristics is well known from the initial works of Hertzsprung (1923), Russell et al (1923), and Eddington (1926). Improvements in the observational data, data analysis techniques, and/or physical models have led to updates and revisions of these empirical relations (see Demircan & Kahraman 1991, for example). The first Gaia data release (Gaia Collaboration et al 2016) has offered a new framework, providing accurate stellar luminosities for a significantly increased sample of stars. This has allowed a revision of the characteristics of some EB (Stassun & Torres 2016). The new Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration et al 2018) has provided parallaxes with unprecedented precision

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call