Abstract

Empirical formulas and closed-form solutions provide, in many cases, good predictions of tunnelling-induced ground movements which, when combined with their computational efficiency, make them valuable for tunnel-structure interaction analyses. For sandy soils, however, there is a shortage of available methods that can adequately describe the changes in soil deformation patterns that occur as a result of tunnel volume loss, soil relative density, and geometrical parameters. In this paper, two approaches are adopted to describe centrifuge test outcomes for tunnelling in dry silica sand of varying relative density. Firstly, empirical expressions for the prediction of settlement trough shape and magnitude are presented; additionally, a set of equations is given to describe the settlement troughs using modified Gaussian curves. Next, semi-analytical expressions (modifying an elastic analytical solution for incompressible soil and ovalized tunnel) are developed to predict both vertical and horizontal movements within the ground. Results from both methods can capture the main effects that cover-to-diameter ratio, relative density, and volume loss have on surface and subsurface ground movement profiles. The proposed expressions can be used for the calibration/verification of tunnel-structure interaction analysis methods by using outputs from comparable centrifuge tests; once verified, these methods may be more widely applied to other scenarios and used within design or risk-assessment exercises.

Highlights

  • During tunnelling, stress relief and over-excavation result in movements within the soil that may cause deformations of subsurface structures and foundations

  • This paper aims to integrate the available centrifuge test data related to greenfield ground movements in sands into computationally efficient methods to enable an accurate replication of the ground movements measured within the centrifuge tests

  • This is because the empirical expressions give a qualitatively different trend of the width parameters with depth, which results in predicted values of K and K being significantly lower than the experimentally obtained values

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stress relief and over-excavation result in movements within the soil that may cause deformations of subsurface structures and foundations. Franza et al (in press) presented a parametric study using centrifuge test data to better understand the effects of soil relative density and tunnel relative depth on greenfield ground deformations in sands. This paper aims to integrate the available centrifuge test data related to greenfield ground movements in sands into computationally efficient methods (empirical expressions and semi-analytical solutions) to enable an accurate replication of the ground movements measured within the centrifuge tests. This paper presents two efficient methods that allow the replication of greenfield tunnelling-induced ground movements measured from centrifuge tests in sand. The predictions of the proposed semi-analytical methods are compared against solutions, available in the literature, of displacements for undrained clay to demonstrate the differences that occur when tunnelling in clay and sand

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call