Abstract
In order to understand why the Soviet past is remembered differently, 25 narratives of nine Lithuanian families (parents, grandparents, and grandchildren) were analyzed. The applied theoretical assumption about the “generational effect” on memory: an “interpretative framework” gained during adolescence or early adulthood has an impact on the way we think about the past. In order to trace generational “interpretative frameworks” and indicate memory generations (that do not per se represent cohorts), the study was inductively focused on how the relation to the Soviet past is constructed. The narration of life stories and re-narration of grandparents’ life stories (for those with no or very limited Soviet experience) enable us to methodologically approach the “generational effect” in different Soviet narratives. A participation in family conversations about the recent past and the subsequent interpretative analysis demonstrate three key motives – emphasis, silencing, and justification – that are used by different generations in terms with the Soviet past. Preliminary four memory generations are indicated based on the way grandparents, parents, and grandchildren construct their relation to such aspects as participation in ideological organizations, “illegal practices,” personal or organized resistance, transformations after the Restoration of Independence in 1990, and a higher status in the hierarchy of the Soviet system.
Highlights
The applied theoretical assumption about the “generational effect” on memory: an “interpretative framework” gained during adolescence or early adulthood has an impact on the way we think about the past
In order to trace generational “interpretative frameworks” and indicate memory generations, the study was inductively focused on how the relation to the Soviet past is constructed
A participation in family conversations about the recent past and the subsequent interpretative analysis demonstrate three key motives – emphasis, silencing, and justification – that are used by different generations in terms with the Soviet past
Summary
Šiandieninis individualus pasakojimas apie sovietmetį – ar jis būtų kuriamas liudininkų, ar jau posovietinės kartos atstovų – yra veikiamas tiek komunikacinės atminties[1], tiek to, kas ISSN 1392-1681 eISSN 2424-6034 Politologija 2019/4 (96) Taigi straipsnio tikslas – analizuojant devynių šeimų trijų kartų atstovų – senelių, tėvų ir anūkų – sovietmečio pasakojimus, ieškoti „kartų efekto“ apraiškų: savitų mąstymo apie praeitį bruožų, leisiančių preliminariai išskirti atminties kartas, nebūtinai sutampančias su kohortinėmis kartomis.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
