Abstract

Students in enabling programs bring richness, diversity, and complexity to the teaching and learning environment. They are often from under-represented backgrounds, have experienced educational disadvantage or disruption, belong to multiple equity groups, and face academic and non-academic challenges, including mental ill-health. This pilot study explored academic staff experiences in teaching and supporting students in enabling programs. Using a collaborative autoethnographical approach, four members of a multi-institutional research group wrote first-person reflections in response to guiding questions. From generative and reflective discussions, different themes arose. A major theme was the high ‘emotional labour demands’ of teaching a vulnerable cohort, with both positive and negative effects on staff. Other major themes included: the diversity of emotional responses and coping strategies; the complex, sometimes contradictory, role of the enabling educator; the importance of communities of care and support; and the impact of witnessing students’ transformations. Within these themes, the challenges, rewards, and protective factors, which mitigate stress among enabling educators, were identified.

Highlights

  • Teaching students from diverse backgrounds is increasingly the norm in Australian universities (Trees, 2013) under the government’s widening participation agenda, triggered by the Bradley Review of Higher Education in 2008 (Bradley, Noonan, Nugent & Scales, 2008)

  • The Australian Higher Education Support Act 2003 defines an enabling program as “a course of instruction provided to a person for the purpose of enabling the person to undertake a course leading to a higher education award” (p. 215)

  • The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of a group of academic staff working in the unique field of enabling education

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Teaching students from diverse backgrounds is increasingly the norm in Australian universities (Trees, 2013) under the government’s widening participation agenda, triggered by the Bradley Review of Higher Education in 2008 (Bradley, Noonan, Nugent & Scales, 2008). Enabling programs generally attract students from under-represented and equity groups, such as: low socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds; regional or remote locations; culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) backgrounds; and students with a disability or medical condition Many of these students have experienced educational disadvantage or disruption and, as a result, are not able to access HE via traditional pathways (Hodges et al, 2013; Lisciandro & Gibbs, 2016). Mental health issues are prevalent amongst enabling cohorts (Crawford et al, 2016; Jones, Lisciandro & Olds, 2016) These students may require more support with academic and nonacademic challenges than students who enter via traditional pathways, to ensure a successful transition to first-year university studies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call