Abstract

Processing of emotional facial expressions is of great importance in interpersonal relationships. Aberrant engagement with facial expressions, particularly an engagement with sad faces, loss of engagement with happy faces, and enhanced memory of sadness has been found in depression. Since most studies used adult faces, we here examined if such biases also occur in processing of infant faces in those with depression or depressive symptoms. In study 1, we recruited 25 inpatient women with major depression and 25 matched controls. In study 2, we extracted a sample of expecting parents from the NorBaby study, where 29 reported elevated levels of depressive symptoms, and 29 were matched controls. In both studies, we assessed attentional bias with a dot-probe task using happy, sad and neutral infant faces, and facial memory bias with a recognition task using happy, sad, angry, afraid, surprised, disgusted and neutral infant and adult faces. Participants also completed the Ruminative Responses Scale and Becks Depression Inventory-II. In study 1, we found no group difference in either attention to or memory accuracy for emotional infant faces. Neither attention nor recognition was associated with rumination. In study 2, we found that the group with depressive symptoms disengaged more slowly than healthy controls from sad infant faces, and this was related to rumination. The results place emphasis on the importance of emotional self-relevant material when examining cognitive processing in depression. Together, these studies demonstrate that a mood-congruent attentional bias to infant faces is present in expecting parents with depressive symptoms, but not in inpatients with Major Depression Disorder who do not have younger children.

Highlights

  • Human survival depends on infants drawing attention from adults

  • Hypothesis 1 is refuted as both groups are slower to disengage from congruent happy faces [independent t-test finds no group difference to happy faces, t(56) = 0.871, p = 0.388, d = 0.229]

  • For attentional bias we found that the difference between the Major Depression Disorder (MDD) group and the depressed group had a medium effect size, F(1, 51) = 3.227, p = 0.078, η2 = 0.06

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human survival depends on infants drawing attention from adults. Infants’ cues are of high evolutionary significance and processing of infant faces is assumed to be prominent. Lorenz (1943) termed this innate mechanism the “Kindchenschema” or baby schema. Lorenz (1943) termed this innate mechanism the “Kindchenschema” or baby schema This mechanism attracts attention and care behaviors toward infants (Lorenz, 1943; Luo et al, 2011). Brain areas associated with face processing and attention respond more strongly to infant faces than adult faces (Leibenluft et al, 2004; Kringelbach et al, 2008; Luo et al, 2015). Less is known about how mental illness, in this case depression, might alter the cognitive processing of infant faces. One possibility is that the baby schema ensures normal infant face processing in depression

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call