Abstract

AimThe present study aims to extend the knowledge of the neural correlates of emotion processing in first episode subjects affected by anorexia nervosa (AN) or bulimia nervosa (BN). We applied an emotional distress paradigm targeting negative emotions thought to be relevant for interpersonal difficulties and therapeutic resistance mechanisms.MethodsThe current study applied to 44 female participants with newly diagnosed AN or BN and 20 matched controls a neuroimaging paradigm eliciting affective responses. The measurements also included an extensive assessment comprising clinical scales, neuropsychological tests, measures of emotion processing and empathy.ResultsAN and BN did not differ from controls in terms of emotional response, emotion matching, self-reported empathy and cognitive performance. However, eating disorder and psychopathological clinical scores, as well as alexithymia levels, were increased in AN and BN. On a neural level, no significant group differences emerged, even when focusing on a region of interest selected a priori: the amygdala. Some interesting findings put in relation the hippocampal activity with the level of Body Dissatisfaction of the participants, the relative importance of the key nodes for the common network in the decoding of different emotions (BN = right amygdala, AN = anterior cingulate area), and the qualitative profile of the deactivations.ConclusionsOur data do not support the hypothesis that participants with AN or BN display reduced emotional responsiveness. However, peculiar characteristics in emotion processing could be associated to the three different groups. Therefore, relational difficulties in eating disorders, as well as therapeutic resistance, could be not secondary to a simple difficulty in feeling and identifying basic negative emotions in AN and BN participants.

Highlights

  • Anorexia nervosa (AN) and Bulimia nervosa (BN) are the two major Eating Disorders (ED): serious and complex psychiatric conditions with a multifactorial biopsychosocial pathogenesis, often characterized by a chronic and disabling course and only partial therapeutic success [1,2]

  • AN and BN did not differ from controls in terms of emotional response, emotion matching, self-reported empathy and cognitive performance

  • Some interesting findings put in relation the hippocampal activity with the level of Body Dissatisfaction of the participants, the relative importance of the key nodes for the common network in the decoding of different emotions (BN = right amygdala, AN = anterior cingulate area), and the qualitative profile of the deactivations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anorexia nervosa (AN) and Bulimia nervosa (BN) are the two major Eating Disorders (ED): serious and complex psychiatric conditions with a multifactorial biopsychosocial pathogenesis, often characterized by a chronic and disabling course and only partial therapeutic success [1,2]. Prioritizing the treatment of symptoms results in better outcomes in BN and allows dealing with the main cause of mortality in AN [4]. It remains controversial whether doing so ignores core psychopathological elements, linked to more complex symptoms and long-term outcomes such as relationship difficulties or impairments in affect regulation, reflective functioning, and coherence of mind [5]. In BN the difficulties are related to coping with high emotional arousal when facing social and affective stimuli. These difficulties challenge a complex therapeutic approach [7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call