Abstract

The way choices are framed influences decision-making. These “framing effects” emerge through the integration of emotional responses into decision-making under uncertainty. It was previously reported that susceptibility to the framing effect was reduced in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) due to a reduced tendency to incorporate emotional information into the decision-making process. However, recent research indicates that, where observed, emotional processing impairments in ASD may be due to co-occurring alexithymia. Alexithymia is thought to arise due to impaired interoception (the ability to perceive the internal state of one’s body), raising the possibility that emotional signals are not perceived and thus not integrated into decision-making in those with alexithymia and that therefore reduced framing effects in ASD are a product of co-occurring alexithymia rather than ASD per se. Accordingly, the present study compared framing effects in autistic individuals with neurotypical controls matched for alexithymia. Results showed a marked deviation between groups. The framing effect was, in line with previous data, significantly smaller in autistic individuals, and there was no relationship between alexithymia or interoception and decision-making in the ASD group. In the neurotypical group, however, the size of the framing effect was associated with alexithymia and interoception, even after controlling for autistic traits. These results demonstrate that although framing effects are associated with interoception and alexithymia in the neurotypical population, emotional and interoceptive signals have less impact upon the decision-making process in ASD.

Highlights

  • The way choices are framed influences decision-making

  • Framing effect (FE) were evident in both individuals with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD), as demonstrated by the greater percentage of trials in which participants chose the gamble option in the loss than gain frame (Fig. 2a)

  • It was shown that this is unlikely to be due to co-occurring alexithymia—instead evidence suggested that interoceptive ability and alexithymia were unrelated to the FE in individuals with ASD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The way choices are framed influences decision-making. These “framing effects” emerge through the integration of emotional responses into decision-making under uncertainty. The size of the framing effect was associated with alexithymia and interoception, even after controlling for autistic traits These results demonstrate that framing effects are associated with interoception and alexithymia in the neurotypical population, emotional and interoceptive signals have less impact upon the decision-making process in ASD. Alexithymia is an independent construct with its own genetic and neurocognitive basis [26, 27], instead of being a feature or symptom of other clinical disorders This means that groups with and without ASD can be matched for alexithymia (e.g., using the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale [TAS-20] [28]) to examine the relative contributions of ASD and alexithymia to socio-emotional functioning.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.