Abstract

Previous studies have shown that emotional facial expressions capture visual attention. However, it has been unclear whether attentional modulation is attributable to their emotional significance or to their visual features. We investigated this issue using a spatial cueing paradigm in which non-predictive cues were peripherally presented before the target was presented in either the same (valid trial) or the opposite (invalid trial) location. The target was an open dot and the cues were photographs of normal emotional facial expressions of anger and happiness, their anti-expressions and neutral expressions. Anti-expressions contained the amount of visual changes equivalent to normal emotional expressions compared with neutral expressions, but they were usually perceived as emotionally neutral. The participants were asked to localize the target as soon as possible. After the cueing task, they evaluated their subjective emotional experiences to the cue stimuli. Compared with anti-expressions, the normal emotional expressions decreased and increased the reaction times (RTs) in the valid and invalid trials, respectively. Shorter RTs in the valid trials and longer RTs in the invalid trials were related to higher subjective arousal ratings. These results suggest that emotional facial expressions accelerate attentional engagement and prolong attentional disengagement due to their emotional significance.

Highlights

  • Previous studies have shown that emotional facial expressions capture visual attention

  • Follow-up analyses of the interaction revealed a significant simple-effect of type in valid, F(1, 66) = 5.93, p < .05, and invalid trials, F(1, 66) = 6.78, p < .05, indicating that the reaction times (RTs) for targets preceded by normal expressions were shorter in valid trials and longer in invalid trials than those for targets preceded by anti-expressions

  • The RTs to localize targets were significantly longer for normal expressions of anger and happiness than for neutral expressions, t(132) > 4.24, ps < .001, rs > .35, whereas anti-expressions of both anger and happiness were not different from neutral expressions, ts[132] < 2.63, ps > . 09

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous studies have shown that emotional facial expressions capture visual attention. Shorter RTs in the valid trials and longer RTs in the invalid trials were related to higher subjective arousal ratings These results suggest that emotional facial expressions accelerate attentional engagement and prolong attentional disengagement due to their emotional significance. Such evolutionary perspective has been empirically supported by studies utilizing the spatial cueing paradigm2–4 In these studies, researchers presented emotional or neutral facial expressions as non-predictive cues in the peripheral visual fields of participants before the presentation of the target at either the same (valid trial) or the opposite (invalid trial) location. The studies showed that the RTs for detecting normal expressions were shorter than were those for detecting anti-expressions, indicating that emotional facial expressions are efficiently processed due to emotional rather than to visual factors These findings corroborate the proposal of the neurocognitive mechanism, suggesting that neural mechanisms for visual and emotional attention may be dissociable. We hypothesized that attentional modulation by emotional facial expressions would be attributable to emotional significance rather than to visual features

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call