Abstract

In this paper, we argue for a stronger engagement between concepts in affective and social neuroscience on the one hand, and theories from the fields of anthropology, economics, political science, and sociology on the other. Affective and social neuroscience could provide an additional assessment of social theories. We argue that some of the most influential social theories of the last four decades—rational choice theory, behavioral economics, and post-structuralism—contain assumptions that are inconsistent with key findings in affective and social neuroscience. We also show that another approach from the social sciences—plural rationality theory—shows greater compatibility with these findings. We further claim that, in their turn, social theories can strengthen affective and social neuroscience. The former can provide more precise formulations of the social phenomena that neuroscientific models have targeted, can help neuroscientists who build these models become more aware of their social and cultural biases, and can even improve the models themselves. To illustrate, we show how plural rationality theory can be used to further specify and test the somatic marker hypothesis. Thus, we aim to accelerate the much-needed merger of social theories with affective and social neuroscience.

Highlights

  • Affective and social neuroscience have rapidly advanced during the last 25 years (Baron-Cohen et al, 2013; Debiec et al, 2014)

  • In the first half of the paper, we demonstrate how affective and social neuroscience can enhance theorizing in anthropology, economics, political science, and sociology

  • Thereafter, we introduce four general theories that currently abound in anthropology, economics, political science, and sociology, paying particular attention to their treatment of emotions, rationality, and decision-making

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Affective and social neuroscience have rapidly advanced during the last 25 years (Baron-Cohen et al, 2013; Debiec et al, 2014). Affective and social neuroscience can support the social sciences by offering additional assessments of the assumptions that social theories make regarding cognition, emotion, decisionmaking, and social behavior. It would be problematic if such theories rested on premises that are inconsistent with insights that have been carefully collected in brain research. Frameworks from anthropology, economics, political science, and sociology can help efforts to formulate and specify neuroscientific models. In this paper we show how the somatic marker hypothesis proposed in affective and social neuroscience can be specified more fully with the help of a theory developed in anthropology and political science. We conclude by discussing how this model can be tested with neuroscientific means

Can Improve Social Theory
Key Insights from Affective and Social
How Social Theory Can Improve Affective and Social Neuroscience
Clearing up a Conceptual Conundrum
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call