Abstract
AbstractTo comply with the stringent Euro VI emission standards, two techniques have been proposed for natural gas engines, namely, lean-burn combustion with oxidation catalyst (OC) and stoichiometric combustion with three-way catalyst (TWC). In this paper, comparisons are drawn between the two techniques in terms of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and methane (CH4) emissions and fuel economy. The results indicated that the postcatalyst CO emissions of lean-burn combustion with OC are lower, whereas the postcatalyst NOx and CH4 emissions are higher than those of stoichiometric combustion with TWC. This can be explained by the combined effects of lower engine-out CO emissions and higher engine-out NOx and CH4 emissions as well as lower overall conversion efficiency for all emissions with the adoption of lean-burn combustion with OC. Thus, it can be concluded that although the fuel economy of stoichiometric combustion with TWC is inferior to lean-burn combustion with OC, it is still considered ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
