Abstract

This special issue is devoted to Prof. Dr. W. Lens, who passed away end of August 2014 while he was vacationing. The special issue is meant to honor Willy’s intellectual contribution to the field of motivation psychology and his enthusiastic and devoted mentorship, which has spurred many of us to study motivation-related topics. In line with Willy’s interest and extensive network, the special issue brings together scholars from diverse theoretical perspectives (i.e., Achievement Goal Theory, Future Time Perspective Theory, and Self-Determination Theory) and diverse cultural backgrounds (i.e., China, Peru, Greece, Portugal, Belgium, US, Australia, Canada). We introduce the special issue by highlighting four emerging trends that characterize contemporary motivation psychology and that were central to Willy’s work: (a) multiperspectivism (i.e., a reliance on multiple motivational frameworks); (b) the diversity of motives and goals that underlie behavior (i.e., motivational heterogeneity); (c) interest in motives for non-participation; and (d) the issue of universalism versus relativism (i.e., the question whether there exist universal motivational processes or whether these processes are contingent upon sociodemographic, personality-based, and contextual factors). Each of the eight contributions in the special issue touch upon one or more of these emerging themes, which are critically discussed in conjunction with a number of directions for future research.

Highlights

  • Much as Willy shared his enthusiasm with other scholars about concepts, findings, and achievements, we want to share our enthusiasm regarding this special issue with the readership of Psychologica Belgica

  • We hope that this opening contribution and the various separate empirical contributions may further stimulate the debate and empirical research about motivational dynamics

  • The special issue closes with a personal tribute to Willy, discussing his personality, interests and way of being in the academic community

Read more

Summary

Conclusion

The field of motivation psychology is “alive and kicking”, perhaps more than it has ever been (Ryan, 2012a). Willy has had a significant role in putting this topic so high on the research agenda He has intrigued, inspired, and even paved the way for many of us, in Flanders, Belgium, his home country, but across the world. Much as Willy shared his enthusiasm with other scholars about concepts, findings, and achievements, we want to share our enthusiasm regarding this special issue with the readership of Psychologica Belgica. We hope that this opening contribution and the various separate empirical contributions may further stimulate the debate and empirical research about motivational dynamics. Note 1 But even if poor and good quality types of motivation are assessed separately, the subtraction of the one score from the other to obtain a single composite score precludes one to study whether both poor and good quality types of motivation co-exist

Motivation Psychology
When are mastery goals more adaptive?

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.