Abstract
Marc Fisher MD Section Editor Over the past 2 decades there has been an exponential growth in the scope of disease processes amenable to neuroendovascular treatment. The number and sophistication of the available devices and correspondingly the number of patients undergoing treatment has expanded accordingly. The development and implementation of these new procedures has in some cases outpaced our ability to carefully assess their merits. In comparison to peripheral and coronary vascular disease, neurovascular lesions are less common and far more heterogeneous, ranging from acquired cerebrovascular ischemic disease to hemorrhagic congenital arteriovenous malformations. Each individual disease process (eg, cerebral aneurysm) is composed of a myriad of lesions with different anatomical and pathophysiological characteristics. The natural history of these lesions and their subtypes are likewise poorly defined. For these reasons, personal bias, institutional custom, and anecdotal experience rather than scientific evidence have played a dominant role in guiding therapy. We must move toward collaborative multi-center efforts, prospective data collection and well designed randomized controlled trials to mature as a field over the coming decades. In some ways, symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (SxICAD) represents an optimal disease process with which to establish this progress toward evidenced based treatment. SxICAD is considerably less heterogeneous than other cerebrovascular disease processes and is arguably best suited as a paradigm for study. In the current article we have attempted to review the available evidence describing the natural history of medically treated SxICAD to determine those patients best suited for invasive treatment strategies. We will also discuss the available treatment modalities which may represent viable options to medical therapy. These data form the basis for the design of future prospective multicenter studies to evaluate the relative merits of interventional treatment. Any invasive treatment strategy for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis must satisfy two criteria to establish viability as a …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.