Abstract
The targeting of scarce mental health resources is currently organised around three broad areas: treating severe mental illness; reducing suicide; and obviating risk to the wider community. High priority clients are those who present with either psychotic symptoms, or who are perceived to be high risk to self or others. This study examined records of emergency assessments at a mental health trust in the south-east of England over a three-month period (n = 336) to see whether clients with these characteristics are more likely than others to be offered hospital admission or treatment. It was found that clients presenting with psychosis are much more likely to be offered admission than those assessed as non-psychotic, that those assessed as a suicide risk are also significantly more likely to be offered admission, and that those assessed as presenting a risk to the public at large are no more likely to be admitted than those presenting no risk. This investigation indicates that the emergency service of the trust studied is addressing the first two target areas, but may be underperforming in the third.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
