Abstract

ObjectiveThis study sought to identify factors that influence emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians’ destination decision-making for pediatric patients. We also sought EMS clinicians’ opinions on potential systems improvements, such as protocol changes and the use of evidence-based transport guidelines.MethodsThirty-six in-depth phone interviews were conducted using a semi-structured format. We utilized a modified Grounded Theory approach to understand the complicated decision-making processes of EMS personnel. Memo writing was used throughout the data collection and analysis processes in order to identify emerging themes. The research team utilized hierarchical coding of interview transcripts to organize data into sub-categories for final analysis. ResultsEMS clinicians cited the perceived need for specialty care, the presence of a medical home, a desire for improved continuity of care, and the availability of aeromedical transport as factors that promoted transport to a pediatric specialty center. They voiced that children with emergent stabilization needs should be transported to the closest facility, however, they did not identify any specific medical conditions suitable for transport to non-specialty centers. EMS clinicians recommended improvements in pediatric-specific education, improved clarity of hospitals’ pediatric capabilities, and the creation of a pediatric-specific destination decision-making tool.ConclusionThis study describes specific factors that influence EMS clinicians’ transport destination decision-making for pediatric patients. It also describes potential systems and educational improvements that may increase pediatric transport directly to definitive care. EMS clinicians are in support of specific designations for hospitals’ pediatric capabilities and were in favor of the creation of a formal destination decision-making tool.

Highlights

  • Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians (Basic and Advanced Emergency Medical Technicians and Paramedics) are tasked with assessing, treating, and transporting patients in the prehospital environment [1,2,3]

  • This study describes specific factors that influence EMS clinicians’ transport destination decision-making for pediatric patients

  • As a part of this education, EMS clinicians should be introduced to the Emergency Information Form (EIF), a simple and easy to utilize document for children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN) endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Emergency Physicians [3,30]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians (Basic and Advanced Emergency Medical Technicians and Paramedics) are tasked with assessing, treating, and transporting patients in the prehospital environment [1,2,3]. The transport destination determined by the EMS clinician is a important aspect of the child’s overall emergency care. While direct transport protocols proliferate in adult populations such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), stroke, and psychiatric emergencies, similar guidelines and decision-making tools have not taken hold for pediatric patients with the exception of major trauma [7,10,11]. In the absence of established evidence-based guidelines (EBGs), EMS clinicians rely on their gestalt to determine the appropriate destination decision for pediatric patients. While some published literature exists regarding EMS pediatric transport patterns, little is known about how EMS clinicians make these decisions [12,13,14]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call