Emergency Hospital Admissions for Initial Febrile Urinary Tract Infection: Do Patient Demographics Matter?

Abstract

BackgroundIn 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics revised practice parameters regarding febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) in children aged 2–24 months. The Section on Urology opposed the omission of voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), and expressed concern that potential untoward consequences of deferring VCUG may be most felt by children on Medicaid. ObjectiveWe ascertained imaging and characteristics of children presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with initial fUTI to determine the impact of patient demographics on admissions for pyelonephritis. MethodsChildren aged 2–24 months presenting to the ED with initial fUTI were identified. Demographics, insurance status, laboratory studies, renal-bladder ultrasound (RBUS), VCUG, and hospital admission status were evaluated. ResultsThree-hundred fifty patients met inclusion criteria; 88 (25.1%) were admitted. Admitted patients were significantly (p < 0.001) younger (mean 0.31 ± 0.33 years) than those managed as outpatients (mean 0.91 ± 0.7 years). On univariate analysis, male gender (p < 0.001), Medicaid insurance (p < 0.05), and non-Hispanic race (p < 0.05) were associated with admission. Race retained significance on multivariate analysis; Caucasian children were 2.35 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79–7.23) and African-American children 3.8 times more likely to be admitted than Hispanic patients (95% CI 1.88–7.63). Children with abnormal RBUS were 12.8 times more likely to require admission (95% CI 4.44–37.0). Medicaid was also independently predictive of admission; such patients were 2.6 times more likely to be admitted than those with private insurance (95% CI 1.15–5.88). ConclusionsAbnormal ultrasound, non-Hispanic race, and public insurance were strongly associated with hospital admission in children presenting to the ED with initial febrile urinary tract infection.