Emergency department-initiated home oxygen for viral bronchiolitis: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Abstract

The use of emergency department (ED)-initiated outpatient oxygen therapy has been considered to be a possible alternative to hospitalization for otherwise healthy-appearing, well-hydrated infants with uncomplicated disease. However, a formal economic evaluation of this treatment strategy is lacking. The aim of the present study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of ED-initiated outpatient oxygen therapy versus conventional inpatient hospitalization in infants with uncomplicated hypoxic bronchiolitis living in Bogota, the high-altitude capital city of Colombia, a middle-income country (MIC). A decision analysis model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of ED-initiated outpatient oxygen therapy versus hospitalization. The main outcome of the model was avoidance of admission to a high-dependency unit. Compared to hospitalization, ED-initiated outpatient oxygen therapy was associated with lower total costs (US$306.7 vs. US$638.7 average cost per patient) and a higher probability of avoidance of admission to a high-dependency unit (0.9528 vs. 0.8960), thus leading to dominance. The results were robust to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Our study suggests that in infants attending the ED with an uncomplicated hypoxic bronchiolitis episode in the city of Bogota, a high-altitude city, ED-initiated outpatient oxygen therapy is a dominant strategy compared to conventional inpatient hospitalization, because it involves a higher probability of avoidance of admission to a high-dependency unit, at lower total treatment costs.