Abstract

Aims and ObjectivesTo identify and describe triage category allocations and their associated patient pathway timeframes in four emergency centres of a large private healthcare group in the United Arab Emirates.BackgroundThe classification of patients in accordance with their acuity level is a complex task that requires quick and accurate allocation. Triage system categories have predetermined timeframes in which patients should be seen by a physician or treatment initiated for the best possible outcome.Design and MethodsAn observational, cross‐sectional study was conducted through the prospective capture and evaluation of medical records from patients triaged in each of the four emergency centres (two hospitals and two clinics) over a period of a month. The STROBE statement was used as a reporting framework. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the timeframes associated with the patient pathway through each EC and contrasted against their allocated triage category.ResultsA total of 4,432 patient records were eligible for analysis from the four emergency centres. Triage category 4 (54.7%) was allocated the most with only a single category 1 patient seen between the four emergency centres. The median time from registration to triage was <10 min and triage to physician consult was <25 min. The overall length of stay of high‐acuity cases was between 1 hr 13 min–2 hr 44 min, compared with low‐acuity cases being 32–49 min. Overall time to physician was substantially lower than the targets set by the triage systems itself.

Highlights

  • Triage plays an important role in the structure and organization of an emergency centre (EC) (Kennedy, Aghababian, Gans, & Lewis, 1996)

  • The manual data were captured by the triage nurses completing a one‐page form during their triage assessment of patients presenting to their ECs

  • The triage systems in use in these ECs each have time targets set for patients to be seen

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Triage plays an important role in the structure and organization of an emergency centre (EC) (Kennedy, Aghababian, Gans, & Lewis, 1996). It is recognized internationally that triage should be conducted in a structured way that relies on the objective assessment of patients to determine their acuity based on medical evidence (Fry & Burr, 2002). Triage systems are broken down into cat‐ egories, usually ranging from three to five levels (Parenti, Manfredi, Bacchi Reggiani, Sangiorgi, & Lenzi, 2010) These categories are re‐ lated to specified timeframes in which a patient should be seen by a physician or treatment initiated. This private hospital group uses a combination of five‐level triage systems in its ECs (Table 1). This study formed part of a larger research project that aimed to design and develop a stan‐ dardized locally appropriate triage system (Dippenaar, 2016)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call