Abstract

DesignThis study surveyed patients with stored frozen embryos and developed and tested an intervention through a randomized trial to support subjects to consider embryo disposition options (EDOs), especially donation for family building.MethodsBased on a review of literature on EDOs, the authors developed and mailed a 2-page anonymous survey to 1,053 patients in Massachusetts (USA) to elicit their feelings about their stored embryos. Target patients had embryos cryopreserved for ≥1 year and had not indicated an EDO. Survey respondents were next randomized between usual care (control arm) or an offer of complimentary counseling and educational support regarding EDOs. These counseling sessions were conducted by a licensed mental health professional specializing in infertility treatment.ResultsDespite telephone reminders, only 21.3% of patients responded, likely reflecting most patients’ reluctance to address EDOs. Respondents endorsed an average of 2 of the 5 EDOs, with the following percentages supporting each option: store for future attempts (82%), continue storage (79%), donate to research (29%), discard (14%), and donate for family building (13%). When asked their opinions towards embryo donation to another couple, 78% of patients agreed that donation is a way to help another couple, 48% would consider embryo donation to another family if they had a better understanding of the process, and 38% would be willing to consider donation if they were not going to use the embryos themselves, but 73% expressed discomfort with donation. In the randomized trial, 7.8% of intervention subjects (n = 8) obtained counseling sessions compared to 0.0% (none) of usual care subjects (p = 0.0069). Counseling participants valued not only discussing EDOs, but also assistance in expressing their feelings and differences with their partners.ConclusionImprovement in counseling rates over the control arm suggests that free professional counseling is a small, but likely effective, step towards deciding on an EDO.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01883934 (Frozen embryo donation study).

Highlights

  • Respondents endorsed an average of 2 of the 5 embryo disposition options (EDOs), with the following percentages supporting each option: store for future attempts (82%), continue storage (79%), donate to research (29%), discard (14%), and donate for family building (13%). When asked their opinions towards embryo donation to another couple, 78% of patients agreed that donation is a way to help another couple, 48% would consider embryo donation to another family if they had a better understanding of the process, and 38% would be willing to consider donation if they were not going to use the embryos themselves, but 73% expressed discomfort with donation

  • 7.8% of intervention subjects (n = 8) obtained counseling sessions compared to 0.0% of usual care subjects (p = 0.0069)

  • Improvement in counseling rates over the control arm suggests that free professional counseling is a small, but likely effective, step towards deciding on an EDO

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2003, a study performed by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) and the RAND Corporation surveyed more than 430 assisted reproductive technology (ART) practices in the United States and reported that there were approximately 400,000 embryos stored in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) centers throughout the USA [1]. This number has probably risen to well over half a million, and is likely to grow dramatically with improved success of IVF, embryo culture, and cryopreservation techniques [2]. Couples may have differing views about these options

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.