Abstract

Background Different aortic atherosclerotic plaque morphologic features may have varying embolic potentials. Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) in the aorta, as in the left atrium, has been associated with an increased risk of embolic events and often occurs with complex aortic atherosclerosis. Thus an evaluation of their isolated and combined association with embolic events was undertaken. Methods We retrospectively studied all patients who underwent biplane or multiplane transesophageal echocardiography meeting the following inclusion and exclusion criteria: age ≥55 years and no other cardiac pathologic condition known to be associated with embolic events other than aortic atherosclerosis or aortic SEC. The 105 patients meeting the criteria were divided into those with aortic atherosclerosis and/or aortic SEC (the study group) and those without these aortic pathologic conditions (the comparison group). Complex aortic atherosclerosis was defined as mobile, ulcerated, or protuberant (> 4 mm). SEC was defined as a pulsatile, swirling echo pattern within the aortic lumen. Embolic events included strokes, transient ischemic attacks, or peripheral emboli. Results The 61 study patients and 44 comparison patients did not significantly differ with respect to the reason for referral, age, or sex. Embolic events occurred in 35 patients. Those with ulcerated or mobile plaques had a greater prevalence of embolic events (odds ratio 4.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-15.5; P < .05). The highest embolic event rate was seen in patients with any complex atherosclerosis and concomitant SEC (odds ratio 9.00; 95% confidence interval, 2.06-39.3; P < .01). Patients with SEC alone or protuberant plaques alone did not have a higher event rate (odds ratio 1.71 and 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-5.17 and 0.15-2.47, respectively). Conclusions Embolic events were associated with the presence of ulcerated or mobile aortic plaques. In addition, the combination of aortic SEC and any complex atherosclerosis had the highest embolic association. (Am Heart J 1999;137:1088-93.)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.