Abstract

Recently, there has been growing concern about the lack of intentionality of mega sport event (MSE) organisers in ensuring that child rights are adequately respected, protected and promoted before, during, and after the events take place. In the context of the summer Olympic Games, reported child rights infringements have been on the rise, both in relation to abuse in sport itself and the negative consequences associated with planning and delivering the Games. In response to reports of child rights infringements, a coalition of actors, including non-governmental and civil society organisations have sought to pressure event owners and organisers to strengthen protections in the planning and delivery of their events. To date, however, child rights commitments have not been fully embedded in policies and principles guiding the planning and delivery of the Olympic Games. In this article, we explore the field of child rights in the context of the Olympic Games, focusing on a case study of the Tokyo 2020 edition. Drawing on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with Tokyo 2020 stakeholders and affiliates, detailed appraisal of the planning process was undertaken. Findings show that while the Japanese authorities have signed up to international child rights conventions and embedded some child participation strategies in Games-related activity, there was little evidence that Tokyo 2020 organisers had developed or implemented robust policies, principles or practises to respect, protect and promote child rights in Games planning. This absence, we argue, is because there was no requirement to embed child rights commitments during the bidding or planning phases, as the IOC had yet to enshrine human rights in its host city contract when the Games were first awarded to Tokyo. In conclusion, we argue that it is imperative the IOC embeds child rights principles and protocols in the bidding and planning processes to ensure that the risks to children are foregrounded and acted upon by host cities and their partners, elevating human rights to a position equal to other Games requirements. This study is of international significance as the evidence will aid future host city bidders to ensure children's rights are embedded in MSE policies for each nation.

Highlights

  • The term human rights gained wider currency in the middle of the 20th century (Griffin, 2008)

  • This study addresses a gap in respect of child rights and mega sport event (MSE), taking as its focus the extent to which child rights considerations are effectively embedded in the bidding and planning stages of the Tokyo 2020 summer Olympic Games

  • We argue that while adopting a model of participation that includes the voices of children in the planning phase of the Olympic Games is imperative, robust protection measures must be incorporated into the planning of MSEs if child rights are to be adequately addressed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The term human rights gained wider currency in the middle of the 20th century (Griffin, 2008). Some progress is evident, precipitated by awarding bodies facing increasing pressure from NGOs and civil society organisations (CSOs) to accept responsibility for the impact of their events on the most vulnerable segments of the population in host communities (McGillivray et al, 2021). This pressure has been amplified with growing media coverage of the human rights issue, given impetus by the emergence of independent coalition organisations including the Sport and Rights Alliance (SRA) and its successor, the Centre for Sports and Human Rights. Coordinated activities by these organisations has increased pressure on the IOC, FIFA, and the Commonwealth Games Federation to develop principles, policies, and protocols to more effectively, respect, protect and promote human rights (McGillivray et al, 2019)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.