Abstract

Constructing embankments over soft soils is a challenge for geotechnical engineers due to large settlements. Among diverse ground-improvement methods, combining piles and geosynthetics (e.g., geosynthetic-reinforced piles, deep cement mixing columns, geotextile-encased columns) emerges as a reliable solution for time-bound projects and challenging ground conditions. While stress distribution within pile-supported embankments has been extensively studied, the load transfer efficiency of piled solutions with geosynthetic reinforcement remains less explored. The novelty in this study lies in the investigation of three different inclusion solutions from a common control case in the numerical model considering the role of geosynthetic reinforcement. This study investigates the load transfer mechanisms in embankments supported by various techniques including geosynthetic-reinforced piles, deep cement mixing columns, and geosynthetic-encased granular columns. Two-dimensional axisymmetric finite element models were developed for three cases of embankments supported by vertical inclusions. Numerical findings allow clarification of the soft ground and embankment characteristics which influence the arching and membrane efficiencies. Rigid piles outperform deep cement mixing (DCM) columns and geotextile-encased columns (GEC) in reducing settlements of soft ground. Geosynthetic reinforcements are particularly helpful for rigid pile solutions in high embankments due to their load transfer capability. Additionally, physical properties of fill soil can impact the inclusion solutions, with high shear resistance enhancing the arching effect and lower modulus subsoils showing better arching performance.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call