Abstract

Zymomonas mobilis is an excellent ethanologenic bacterium. Biomass pretreatment and saccharification provides access to simple sugars, but also produces inhibitors such as acetate and furfural. Our previous work has identified and confirmed the genetic change of a 1.5-kb deletion in the sodium acetate tolerant Z. mobilis mutant (AcR) leading to constitutively elevated expression of a sodium proton antiporter encoding gene nhaA, which contributes to the sodium acetate tolerance of AcR mutant. In this study, we further investigated the responses of AcR and wild-type ZM4 to sodium acetate stress in minimum media using both transcriptomics and a metabolic labeling approach for quantitative proteomics the first time. Proteomic measurements at two time points identified about eight hundreds proteins, or about half of the predicted proteome. Extracellular metabolite analysis indicated AcR overcame the acetate stress quicker than ZM4 with a concomitant earlier ethanol production in AcR mutant, although the final ethanol yields and cell densities were similar between two strains. Transcriptomic samples were analyzed for four time points and revealed that the response of Z. mobilis to sodium acetate stress is dynamic, complex, and involved about one-fifth of the total predicted genes from all different functional categories. The modest correlations between proteomic and transcriptomic data may suggest the involvement of posttranscriptional control. In addition, the transcriptomic data of forty-four microarrays from four experiments for ZM4 and AcR under different conditions were combined to identify strain-specific, media-responsive, growth phase-dependent, and treatment-responsive gene expression profiles. Together this study indicates that minimal medium has the most dramatic effect on gene expression compared to rich medium followed by growth phase, inhibitor, and strain background. Genes involved in protein biosynthesis, glycolysis and fermentation as well as ATP synthesis and stress response play key roles in Z. mobilis metabolism with consistently strong expression levels under different conditions.

Highlights

  • Yeast strains are among the leading current generation industrial biocatalyst microorganisms for fuel production (Hahn-Hagerdal et al, 2006)

  • MOBILIS TO SODIUM ACETATE IN MINIMAL MEDIUM (MM) The growth of Z. mobilis wild-type ZM4 and acetate tolerant Z. mobilis mutant (AcR) mutant in MM supplemented with 0, 12, or 16 g/L NaAc as well as 8.65 or 11.4 g/L NaCl with same corresponding Na+ molar concentrations as NaAc was assessed using a Bioscreen C instrument (Growth Curves USA, NJ) under anaerobic conditions to determine the effect of NaCl and NaAc on Z. mobilis growth and to decide on an appropriate NaAc concentration for subsequent systems biology studies

  • Consistent with earlier rich media (RM) results, wild-type ZM4 growth was arrested when NaAc was added to minimum medium at 16 g/L, and differences were observed between ZM4 and AcR with NaAc supplemented at concentrations of 12 g/L (Additional File 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Yeast strains are among the leading current generation industrial biocatalyst microorganisms for fuel production (Hahn-Hagerdal et al, 2006). Engineered bacteria such as Zymomonas mobilis, E. coli, Bacillus subtilis are being developed and deployed to address commercial biofuel catalyst requirements (Dien et al, 2003; Inui et al, 2004; Romero et al, 2007; Alper and Stephanopoulos, 2009). The genome sequences for strains ZM4, NCIMB 11163, 10988, 29291 and 29292 have been determined (Seo et al, 2005; Kouvelis et al, 2009, 2011; Pappas et al, 2011; Desiniotis et al, 2012), and the ZM4 genome annotation was improved recently (Yang et al, 2009a). Genome-scale in silico metabolic modeling analysis have been reported (Lee et al, 2010; Widiastuti et al, 2011; Rutkis et al, 2013) and recombinant strains have been engineered to express and secret cellulase (Linger et al, 2010) or ferment hexoses and pentose sugars such as xylose and arabinose (Zhang et al, 1995; Deanda et al, 1996)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.