Abstract
A common two-tier structure for social networks is based on partitioning society into two parts, referred to as the elite and the periphery, where the “elite” is the relatively small but well-connected and highly influential group of powerful individuals around which the society is centered, and the “periphery” consists of the rest of society. It is observed that the relative sizes of economic and social elites in various societies appear to be continually declining. One possible explanation is that this is a natural social phenomenon, resembling Price’s “square root” law for the fraction of good scientists in the scientific community. We try to assess the validity of this explanation by studying the elite-periphery structure via introducing a novel axiom-based model for representing and measuring the influence between the elite and the periphery. The model is accompanied by a set of axioms that capture the elite’s dominance, robustness and density, as well as a compactness property. Relying on the model and the accompanying axioms, we are able to draw a number of insightful conclusions about the elite-periphery structure. In particular, we show that in social networks that respect our axioms, the size of a compact elite is sublinear in the network size. This agrees with Price’s principle but appears to contradict the common belief that the elite size tends to a linear fraction of society (recently claimed to be around 1%). We propose a natural method to create partitions with nice properties, based on the key observation that an elite-periphery partition is at what we call a ‘balance point’, where the elite and the periphery maintain a balance of powers. Our method is based on setting the elite to be the k most influential nodes in the network and suggest the balance point as a tool for choosing k and therefore the size of the elite. When using nodes degrees to order the nodes, the resulting k-rich club at the balance point is the elite of a partition we refer to as the balanced edge-based partition. We accompany these findings with an empirical study on 32 real-world social networks, which provides evidence that balanced edge-based partitions which satisfying our axioms commonly exist.
Highlights
1.1 Elites in societyAlmost all societies exhibit an uneven distribution of power, influence, and wealth among their members
Empirical Results In addition to the theoretical results on elite axioms and properties, we studied 32 real networks, in order to examine the extent to which our axioms are manifested in reality, and check if there are core-periphery partitions that evolve over time according to the axioms
We show that the number of crossing edges is maximized at the balance point and provide an analytical explanation for this phenomenon under the configuration model
Summary
Almost all societies exhibit an (often radically) uneven distribution of power, influence, and wealth among their members (rare exceptions are utopian or totally egalitarian societies). This may be related to a well known and widely accepted observation made by the pioneering sociologist Vilfredo Pareto in his book Mind and Society [1]: “Every people is governed by an elite, by a chosen element of the population”. The relative size of the elite from the population, is an ancient source of interest in the social sciences. Rousseau claimed that a democratic government should be formed of a number of people equal to the square root of the total number of citizens in the state
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.